The Editorial Team reserves the right to reject those manuscripts that: do not meet the requirements of the checklist; have formal or methodological deficiencies; findings do not add substantial knowledge or are out of the scope of the journal. Rejection will be notified to the authors without further correspondence.
The sections of this journal are as follows:
• Human and Social Sciences.
• Physical Activity and Health.
• Physical Education.
• Sport Pedagogy.
• Physical Preparation.
• Sports Training.
• Sport Management, Active Leisure, and Tourism.
Opinion articles and scientific letters are also accepted based on the judgment of the Editorial Board.
A new section, Scientific Notes, is included. Articles in short format, oriented to news and scientific prospects, which follow a predetermined structure, and in English.
To publish in this Journal it is necessary that the authors follow the following instructions:
Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research
Details on the peer review process used by the journal (phases, possible outcomes).
The journal follows a plagiarism screening policy.
The studies must be original and unpublished, preferably grounded upon scholarly research and not in the process of being simultaneously reviewed by any other journal or publication. For this reason, a certificate signed and dated by the main author stating explicitly that the article enclosed has not been published and is not being reviewed by any other journal or publication, and, if needed, that it is based on scholarly research, is required.
It is very important to carefully read the different requirements which are preconditions for publication, otherwise the manuscript will be returned for failure to comply with the norms. If you have any questions on submitting material, send an email to email@example.com or call +34 93 241 79 89.
Through the ONLINE PLATFORM
The process of submitting manuscripts has 5 steps:
- 1. START: check to ship, authors transfer property rights and may make comments to the editor.
- 2. UPLOAD SHIPPING: only the original article (.doc .docx) to be reviewed is uploaded.
- 3. ENTER THE METADATA: the authors’ personal data are filled in and the contact author is indicated.
- 4. UPLOAD COMPLEMENTARY FILES: in this step, you upload a presentation page in Microsoft Word document or similar (avoid PDF). This document serves to facilitate the work of the editorial manager and consists of: identification data, affiliation and contact details of the authors defining the author of correspondence, graphics, images or videos in high quality to improve the article (optional)
- 5. CONFIRMATION: the final step in which the shipment is confirmed.
Specification of the files to send on the ONLINE platform
A single copy (.doc/.docx) should be sent which only consists of these three sections:
- Title of the article.
- International search engines use the last surname by default. We advise using only one surname or joining both surnames with a hyphen. Make sure that the authors’ affiliation is officially recognized by each institution. Include personal identifiers or Publons (ResearcherID) or ORCID. Indicate in the introductory page the type of article (research article, Scientific Notes*, survey article or scientific letter) and the section of the journal to which is it targeted.
- Designation of one author to whom all correspondence should be sent, indicating contact telephones and email addresses.
Letter acknowledging authorship and statement of conflicts of interest
A letter should be sent to the director of the journal including:
- The title of the article
- The section in which the authors would like it published
- The authors’ acceptance of the content submitted
- The authors’ granting the copyright to INEFC, stating that the manuscript has not been previously published, in part or in its entirety, and that it is not in the process of being reviewed by another publication.
A statement of potential conflicts of interest that could affect the article submitted must be included from each of the authors.
The first signatory shall be considered the main author and will be in charge of communication with the journal’s Editorial Board.
The certificate model can be found at the following link. In order to fill out the documentation to be sent by email, the introductory letter with the signatures of the authors can be scanned and sent in electronic format (preferably pdf).
The article must be a document in Microsoft Word (NO PDF) or a similar program and must be in column format so the reviewers can reference the numbering of the paragraphs in their suggestions.
1. Types of articles and section of the journal
Indicate in the introductory page the type of article (research article, Scientific Notes*, survey article or scientific letter) and the section of the journal to which is it targeted.
* The articles meant for Scientific Notes, which are only published in English, should follow a maximum of 1500 words (excluding title, authorship, keywords, summary, tables, figures, acknowledgments, and references), 4 tables or figures and a maximum of 15 references.
Total number of words
The original articles can have a maximum of 4000 words not counting the title, authors, keywords abstract, tables, figures, acknowledgments, and references. In the articles of systematic review and meta-analysis, this standard can be consulted with the Editorial Board. APA guidelines encourage authors to eliminate any redundancies, ambiguities, and generalities that could hinder the understanding of the scientific text.
Spanish, Catalan, or English.
In Word format with continuous line numbers. Respect indentations, titles of tables, figure captions, and references according to APA 7th edition: letter type and size: Times New Roman 12. Line spacing: double (2.0) for the entire text except for the footnotes on the pages; Margins: Use 1-in.= 2.54 cm margins on every side of the page for an APA Style paper. Indentation: Indent the first line of each paragraph of text 0.5 in. from the left margin. Use the tab key or the automatic paragraph-formatting function of your word-processing program to achieve the indentation (the default setting is likely already 0.5 in.=1,25 cm). Do not use the space bar to create an indentation.
The title should be no more than 12 words and should be unequivocal and understandable by specialized readers. It should include a substantive part (the topic) and a part that indicates the method used. If possible, it should indicate aspects like the ages or gender of the participants.
Authors and affiliations
International search engines use the last surname by default. We advise using only one surname or joining both surnames with a hyphen. Make sure that the authors’ affiliation is officially recognized by each institution. Include personal identifiers or Publons (ResearcherID) ID or ORCID.
A maximum of 6, and they are recommended to match the international descriptors (such as TESAURO/MeSH, Inderscience).
A maximum of 250 words and it should not include direct references. It should be organized into the sections: interest of the study, objectives, method, and main results.
The originals should match the following sections:
- Introduction: This can include a maximum of two subsections.
- Methodology: This should be written in the past tense and include: Participants: indicate in the text, for research with participants: a) The existence of informed consent.
b) The full name of the Ethical Committee which has given its approval research and, if any, the code granted (Authorities can attach a copy of said authorization)… Materials and Instruments. Procedure.
- Data Analysis: Written in the past tense.
- Results: Written in the past tense.
- Conclusion: Summarising the main conclusions; it can include limitations and future prospects.
- Contribution: Specify the contribution of each author.
- References: must be a maximum of 25, follow APA standards, 7th ed., and include the DOI of each reference. In the articles of systematic review and meta-analysis, this standard can be consulted with the Editorial Board. In-text references with more than two authors should be cited based on the first author, as in (first Author et al., year). References with just two authors should be cited as (Author & Author, year) In narrative citations use “and”, i.e. Grady et al. (2019) and Jerrentrup et al. (2018).
B. REVIEW POLICY
The Editorial Team reserves the right to reject those manuscripts that: do
not meet the requirements of the checklist; have formal or
methodological deficiencies; findings do not add substantial knowledge or
are out of the scope of the journal. Rejection will be notified to the
authors without further correspondence.
Articles that offer no significant new insights or confirmation of theories will be returned due to a lack of scholarly relevancy and will not proceed through the review process.
All articles initially accepted by the Editorial Board for evaluation in the review process shall be subjected to the same peer-review process using the double-blind procedure. In the event of a discrepancy between the two reviewers on the article being reviewed, a third reviewer will be assigned.
To ensure the integrity of the double-blind review procedure conducted by experts for this journal, the authors must strive to avoid revealing their identity and institutional affiliation. Before submitting the manuscript, we recommend that authors make sure to take the following steps with the text and file properties: the authors of the document must eliminate their names from the text, as well as any reference to their affiliations which could identify them; they should also try to ensure that none of their references appear in the document files.
After the original text has been accepted, it is sent to peer scholars who use the evaluation table (available at www.revista-apunts.com/media/hoja_evaluacion.pdf), to assess the relevancy of the article, its formal aspects, the rigorousness of its contents, the methodology used and possible applications. The reviewers will issue their opinion about whether or not the article should be published with minor changes or with notable changes and modifications, or whether the article should be rejected for publication in the journal. In all cases, the reviewer will provide suggestions, nuances, and comments addressed to the author and the editor.
The corresponding author will anonymously receive the evaluations, suggestions, and opinions from the article evaluated.
After this process, if the article has been accepted for publication, the Editorial Board may make any final observations it deems relevant, which the author should follow precisely and then promptly return the article. These modifications may solely be subjected to the indications of the Editorial Board. The editorial team of the journal must be notified in the event of new changes because of subsequent findings.
Once the article has been definitively accepted before it is published the galley proofs will be sent to the corresponding author, who must review them within at most four days.
The estimated review period is the frequency with which the journal is published, starting from the time when the author is notified of receipt of the article.
The journal holds all copyright and publishing rights. Authors may use their work in accordance with the CC by NC-ND license.
The journal accepts no responsibility for the ideas and opinions expressed by the authors of the articles or contributions.
The journal does not control nor does it take any responsibility for the links and hypertexts in some articles which provide access to features and services offered by third parties on other websites.
D. CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
Texts that are candidates to be published articles must be previously unpublished and original and cannot be in a simultaneous review process to be published in other journals or editorial bodies. To this end, the main author shall send a signed and dated certificate with the text following the document available for download in the following link:
In addition to the above, the author must also declare the absence of plagiarism and state whether the text comes from original research or another empirical or professional work.
E. ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES
No texts which promote any kind of social, racial, political, sexual, or religious discrimination will be published.
When experiments performed on humans or animals are described, the authors must state that the procedures used are in line with the standard ethical norms.
Articles that have received economic or financial assistance to be published must have the permission of the corresponding institution.
The journal accepts no previously published material. The authors are responsible for getting any permits needed to partly reproduce material (text, tables, or figures) from other publications as well as for properly citing their source.
If it is determined that an article which is partly or totally plagiarized from another work has been submitted to this journal, it will automatically be rejected and its authors excluded from publishing in Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes in the future.
You can download the complete ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES document by clicking on the icon below.
F. CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The journal expects authors to state any commercial association that they may have which could entail a conflict of interest in relation to the article submitted.
Only persons who have intellectually contributed to the development of an article may appear in the list of authors. As a general rule, the authors:
- Have participated in the conception and realization of the study that resulted in the submitted article.
- Have participated in writing the text and in any possible revisions.
- Have approved the version that is ultimately published.
The journal refuses to accept any responsibility for possible conflicts stemming from the authorship of the articles published in Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes.
H. INFORMED CONSENT
In the Methods section, the authors must mention that the procedures used in patients, students, and control groups were performed after obtaining their informed consent.